RewardingHub vs AdGem
A detailed comparison of RewardingHub and AdGem for publishers and advertisers.
| Feature | RewardingHub | AdGem |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Share | 70% | 60-65% |
| Min Payout | $50 | $25 |
| Payment Terms | NET-30 | NET-30 |
| SDK Platforms | 5 (Android, iOS, RN, Unity, Flutter) | Varies |
| Min DAU | None | Varies |
| Fraud Detection | 4-layer ML | Standard |
| Integration Time | 5 minutes | Hours to days |
AdGem is a solid offerwall provider popular with reward app developers. However, their smaller offer catalog and limited SDK support can be limiting for publishers looking to scale.
Why Publishers Choose RewardingHub Over AdGem
- Higher revenue share: 70% vs 60-65%
- Broader offer catalog: More offers across more categories and geos
- More SDK platforms: Android, iOS, React Native, Unity, Flutter vs Android/iOS only
- Advanced fraud detection: 4-layer ML-powered system
- Better analytics: Real-time dashboard with cohort analysis
About AdGem
Smaller catalog. Good for reward apps. Limited SDK platforms.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is RewardingHub really better than AdGem?
For most publishers, yes. RewardingHub offers 70% revenue share vs AdGem's 60-65%, lower minimum payouts ($50 vs $25), and a simpler integration process.
Can I use RewardingHub alongside AdGem?
Yes. Many publishers run multiple offerwall providers simultaneously. You can A/B test RewardingHub against AdGem to compare performance.
How do I switch from another provider?
Integration takes under 5 minutes. You can run both providers in parallel during transition. See our getting started guide.
Ready to Switch?
Try RewardingHub risk-free alongside AdGem. 5-minute setup, no commitments.