RewardingHub vs ironSource
A detailed comparison of RewardingHub and ironSource for publishers and advertisers.
| Feature | RewardingHub | ironSource |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Share | 70% | 55-65% |
| Min Payout | $50 | $200 |
| Payment Terms | NET-30 | NET-60 |
| SDK Platforms | 5 (Android, iOS, RN, Unity, Flutter) | Varies |
| Min DAU | None | Varies |
| Fraud Detection | 4-layer ML | Standard |
| Integration Time | 5 minutes | Hours to days |
ironSource (now part of Unity) offers a comprehensive ad mediation platform where the offerwall is just one of many ad formats. This means their offerwall often receives less attention and optimization compared to their interstitial and rewarded video products.
Why Publishers Switch to RewardingHub
- Offerwall-first: Our entire platform is built around offerwalls, not an afterthought
- Higher revenue share: 70% vs 55-65%
- Much lower minimum: $50 vs $200
- Indie-friendly: No minimum DAU or revenue requirements
- Platform choice: Use alongside any mediation stack
About ironSource
Part of Unity. Full mediation stack. Offerwall is one of many products. High minimums.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is RewardingHub really better than ironSource?
For most publishers, yes. RewardingHub offers 70% revenue share vs ironSource's 55-65%, lower minimum payouts ($50 vs $200), and a simpler integration process.
Can I use RewardingHub alongside ironSource?
Yes. Many publishers run multiple offerwall providers simultaneously. You can A/B test RewardingHub against ironSource to compare performance.
How do I switch from another provider?
Integration takes under 5 minutes. You can run both providers in parallel during transition. See our getting started guide.
Ready to Switch?
Try RewardingHub risk-free alongside ironSource. 5-minute setup, no commitments.