RewardingHub vs RevU
A detailed comparison of RewardingHub and RevU for publishers and advertisers.
| Feature | RewardingHub | RevU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Share | 70% | 55-60% |
| Min Payout | $50 | $50 |
| Payment Terms | NET-30 | NET-30 |
| SDK Platforms | 5 (Android, iOS, RN, Unity, Flutter) | Varies |
| Min DAU | None | Varies |
| Fraud Detection | 4-layer ML | Standard |
| Integration Time | 5 minutes | Hours to days |
RevU is a web-focused offerwall provider known for their survey-heavy catalog. While they serve the GPT space well, their limited mobile SDK and web-first approach can be limiting for mobile app developers.
Why Publishers Choose RewardingHub Over RevU
- Higher revenue share: 70% vs 55-60%
- Mobile-first: Native SDKs for 5 platforms vs web-only
- Diverse offer catalog: Games, surveys, signups, and more vs survey-heavy
- Modern SDK: TypeScript support, reactive APIs, theming
- Real-time analytics: Dashboard with eCPM, retention, and cohort data
About RevU
Web-focused. Survey-heavy catalog. Limited mobile SDK.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is RewardingHub really better than RevU?
For most publishers, yes. RewardingHub offers 70% revenue share vs RevU's 55-60%, lower minimum payouts ($50 vs $50), and a simpler integration process.
Can I use RewardingHub alongside RevU?
Yes. Many publishers run multiple offerwall providers simultaneously. You can A/B test RewardingHub against RevU to compare performance.
How do I switch from another provider?
Integration takes under 5 minutes. You can run both providers in parallel during transition. See our getting started guide.
Ready to Switch?
Try RewardingHub risk-free alongside RevU. 5-minute setup, no commitments.