RewardingHub vs Tapjoy
A detailed comparison of RewardingHub and Tapjoy for publishers and advertisers.
| Feature | RewardingHub | Tapjoy |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Share | 70% | 50-60% |
| Min Payout | $50 | $100 |
| Payment Terms | NET-30 | NET-60 |
| SDK Platforms | 5 (Android, iOS, RN, Unity, Flutter) | Varies |
| Min DAU | None | Varies |
| Fraud Detection | 4-layer ML | Standard |
| Integration Time | 5 minutes | Hours to days |
Tapjoy pioneered the offerwall space but has become increasingly enterprise-focused since its acquisition by ironSource (now Unity). Many indie and mid-size publishers find Tapjoy's minimums, integration complexity, and slow support frustrating.
Why Publishers Switch to RewardingHub
- Higher revenue share: 70% vs Tapjoy's 50-60%
- Lower minimum payout: $50 vs $100
- Faster payment terms: NET-30 vs NET-60
- Simpler integration: 5-minute SDK setup vs days of configuration
- No minimum DAU: Works for apps of all sizes
- Better support: Direct access to account managers
About Tapjoy
Enterprise-focused. Acquired by ironSource/Unity. Complex integration. High minimum payouts.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is RewardingHub really better than Tapjoy?
For most publishers, yes. RewardingHub offers 70% revenue share vs Tapjoy's 50-60%, lower minimum payouts ($50 vs $100), and a simpler integration process.
Can I use RewardingHub alongside Tapjoy?
Yes. Many publishers run multiple offerwall providers simultaneously. You can A/B test RewardingHub against Tapjoy to compare performance.
How do I switch from another provider?
Integration takes under 5 minutes. You can run both providers in parallel during transition. See our getting started guide.
Ready to Switch?
Try RewardingHub risk-free alongside Tapjoy. 5-minute setup, no commitments.